A Message of Solidarity: The Trillion Peso March
STANCe stands in unwavering solidarity with the people of the Philippines participating in the Trillion Million Peso March. We stand with you as you voice your righteous outrage against the infamy of corruption that has severely eroded our national pride and jeopardized the socio-economic stability that our people have painstakingly built for a better future for our children.
This powerful call for public accountability coincidentally takes place in September, a month that marks the Season of Creation. Every single peso lost to corruption in infrastructure projects is a stark and damning revelation of the irresponsibility of those entrusted with prudently building solutions for the people, especially in the face of climate change-induced disasters. This corruption reveals a two-pronged disregard for the environment: ineffective and poorly built infrastructure allows ecosystems to be destroyed, and the wasteful procurement processes squander the very natural resources used to construct these projects. Furthermore, the failure of ineffective flood mitigation projects underscores the urgent need to prioritize nature-based solutions for problems in nature itself.
The timing of this march is also significant as it precedes the September 23rd commemoration of the start of Marcos's martial law, a 20-year period of systematic corruption that gutted our country of its resources and dignity. It was an era that established cronyism, created factions, and splintered our people with propaganda and fallacy. We reflect on this history and recognize that the struggle for accountability is a continuation of our people's long-standing fight for justice.
In this spirit, STANCe joins the call for public accountability through more responsive and immediate action on audit findings, open contracting, and beneficial ownership disclosure. We advocate for revisiting systems of public participation in public finance and fiscal governance, especially in processes embedded within Local Government Units (LGUs) like the Bids and Awards Committees (BACs), Local Development Councils (LDCs), and the crafting of sectoral plans.
We must also confront the modern challenge of deepfakes, which limit the quality of public discourse, obfuscate the truth, confuse our people, and dilute their voice and agency. The ability of our communities to understand their social milieu and dispel fallacies rests in community conversations, an exercise that is often unjustly categorized as insurgency.
As we uphold the beauty of dissent, we look at today's events with great hope. This is an opportunity to rebuild our nation by revisiting and reaffirming policies that protect our people's tax money, committing to transparency without reservation, and ensuring an accountability that neither knows party loyalty nor recognizes the location of power to be in the hands of the rich and powerful.
Finally, let this outrage remain with us, unleashed on the ballot in 2028. As politically exposed persons and their obese dynasties draw power by stemming the flow of public goods and diverting them to their familial coffers, our vote can be a powerful rod smashed right into the heart of irresponsible power.
What we do today and how we do it will be judged in history. As Vaclav Havel poignantly described in his speech at Harvard in 1995, “...nothing of what we d
The slogan "From Rage into Grace," encapsulates the core message of STANCe amidst this tumultuous episode in our country's life. We believe that profound and positive change—grace—can emerge from negative the feelings of rage and betrayal that most of us experience now, especially when that rage is born from injustice and systemic failure. Our collective discontent is powerful, our clenched fists raised upward a resonant symbol of solidarity and protest against a flawed status quo. Public anger need not be a destructive force but can be a foundational element for constructive action. The phrase "RADICAL TRANSFORMATIONS CAN START FROM DISCONTENT" directly reinforces this idea, positioning dissatisfaction as the starting point for meaningful societal shifts.
STANCe recommends specific actions that can channel this rage into grace. We outline four areas of action, advocating for a "just, effective, and corruption-free public procurement." Let there be a shift in the discourse from a general feeling of discontent to specific, actionable demands. The points are:
Systematic Overhaul: Calling for greater public participation in the contracting system highlights the need for transparency and community involvement, ensuring that decisions are not made behind closed doors.
Beneficial Ownership Disclosure: A demand for a tool to prevent "state capture," a term for the manipulation of government policy by private interests, targets the root cause of many corrupt practices by making it harder for politically exposed persons to hide their involvement.
Supply Chain Scrutiny: The scrutiny of supply chains is a direct response to substandard projects that "squander away finite and precious natural resources." Corruption must be linked to environmental and economic damage, broadening the scope of its negative impact.
Radical Change of Heart: The final point is the most profound: a "radical change within the hearts of every Filipino." While systemic and legal reforms are crucial, true and lasting change also requires a shift in individual values and ethics, prioritizing the protection of the vulnerable from "plunder and corruption."
Together, let us express a coherent narrative arc. Let us recognize that public rage is a legitimate and powerful force for change. The roadmap that is developed from our sense of discontent is a force that can be harnessed and directed toward specific, targeted reforms.
The visuals—the raised fists, the halo of grace, and the Philippine sun and stars—merge to tell a story of a nation moving from protest to progress, from a state of anger over corruption to a state of grace achieved through collective and systemic reform. The discourse is a powerful blend of practical demands for legal and institutional change and a hopeful, almost spiritual, call for moral transformation. It’s a message that resonates with the idea that genuine progress requires both a change in the rules and a change in the hearts of the people who follow them.
It is time to work for real change.
December 7-9, 2024, 9 AM - 5 PM
Sibonga, Cebu
STANCe, through the PAHRA HR Cities Project which the Government of the UK supports, recently hosted a vibrant 2-day caucus! Bringing together diverse sectors and passionate youth, we celebrated Human Rights Week focusing on collective reflection.
The energy was electric as we explored the interconnectedness of human rights, climate change, and development. Two days of insightful discussions culminated in the creation of a powerful Good Governance Scorecard and a Sectoral Development Agenda – exciting roadmaps for positive change!
The excitement continued at our Forum on December 9th. We were honored to welcome esteemed guests: representatives from the CHR 7, DBM 7 (Local Budget Officer), NYC 7, and the PH-EITI National Coordinator. Their valuable insights enriched the conversation and inspired us all.
A powerful moment arrived as a passionate sectoral representative read a resounding Statement, encapsulating the collective voice of the participants.
Women at the Table: A Personal Experience Storytelling
I am Amy Faith. I am a lawyer, a wife and a mother (not arranged according to relevance). And I am a woman. And there is a story I would like to share with you. Perhaps it begins with the observation that growing up in a middle-class home, there are certain challenging conditions I experienced that my male relatives never did. And this was like 15, 20 years ago. The story is continuing. This is also not unique to me. This may also be your story.
The Philippines stands as one of the highest-ranked countries in terms of gender parity. Based on the 2023 Global Gender Gap Index Report by the World Economic Forum[1], the Philippines continues to lead as the most gender-equal country in Asia, with a 79.1 percent gender parity[2]. This impressive score reflects the country’s commitment to promoting equality and addressing gender disparities.
However, while we celebrate this achievement, it is essential to engage this report. Gender parity is not simply statistics; it encompasses the lived experiences of women, men, and non-binary individuals across various domains:
Workplace Equality: Despite progress, challenges persist in achieving equal pay, representation in leadership roles, and workplace opportunities for women. Advocacy for fair wages, parental leave policies, and combating workplace discrimination remains crucial.
Education and Skills: As an echo to Dr. Cuizon’s discussion, the Philippines has indeed made strides in education, and yet to continuously ensure equal access to quality education and skill development for all genders is essential. Addressing stereotypes and encouraging girls’ participation in STEM fields are still ongoing efforts.
Health and Well-being: Gender parity extends to health outcomes. Access to reproductive health services, you will hear more about it from the next speaker, as well as maternal care, and mental health support should be equitable. Additionally, addressing violence against women and promoting sexual and reproductive rights are critical.
Political Participation: While the Philippines has seen women in prominent political roles, more can be done to encourage women’s active participation in decision-making processes. Gender-responsive policies and inclusive representation matter.
Social Norms and Stereotypes: Challenging harmful gender norms and stereotypes is vital. Promoting positive masculinity, breaking down rigid gender roles, and fostering respectful relationships contribute to a more equitable society. This is also the SDG No. 5.
Participation in natural resource governance: In an artisanal gold mining community somewhere south in the Philippines, women strike stones and refine gold through mercury. In this sense, they are as tough as men. But on the broader side of the extractives value chain, women (and the rest of the sectors wherein they figure prominently) and their development issues are most often neglected in decision-making both in the utilization of environmental and social capitals, and in development appropriations. And because extractives can bring in more serious negative externalities, social protection of women and their children living around extractive projects should be more pronounced in the extractive project’s social and environmental payments particularly in areas of sustainable livelihood and skills upscaling, maternal and child services, infrastructures, and representation.
In addition, women’s participation in political decision-making is a critical aspect of achieving gender equality and promoting inclusive governance. In the Philippines, despite historical challenges, women have made significant strides in shaping policies, advocating for their rights, and occupying key positions. We see trailblazers, of women who paved the way for other women to influence politics. Notably, Corazon Aquino became the first female president in 1986, followed by Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in 2001. Who can forget Miriam Santiago? And of course, Apo Wang-od is a social media darling. Leah Salonga in the performing arts. A host of women scientists and academics. These trailblazers shattered the glass ceiling and inspired generations of women to engage in politics and society.
Over the years, the percentage of women in elected government positions has risen. From 1998 to 2013, women held between 16.1 percent and 20 percent of public offices[3], with a peak in the 2010 elections. However, this progress still falls short of the 30 percent critical mass needed for effective influence in decision-making.[4]
And yet, if we examine further, prevailing patriarchal norms and stereotypes perpetuate the notion that politics is a male-dominated arena. Gender biases often discourage voters from supporting women candidates. You should by now realize the name calling against a woman presidentiable in 2016 taking effect in voter perception but the same is not true to her male opponent.
Balancing domestic responsibilities with political engagement remains a challenge for women. The “multiple burden” of caregiving, household chores, and community work affects their decision to run for public office. I should know, I am a young mother and by default, don’t get me wrong I do love being a mother and yet I must make it an excuse so as not to complain, I take on so many hats in one day that I am pretty sure the Jungian persona archetype has never been truer to anyone than me (and other working moms).
Consonant to my advocacy commitment (an on-going policy analysis is done elsewhere in research and policy advocacy) it is pivotal for women to identify barriers of gender parity and political inclusion to effectively decrease the likelihood that this will happen to our daughters and increase the possibility of our sons to embrace the diversity of human choices and follow the values of inclusion and acceptance.
Some policy barriers identified can also be areas of reform:
1. Gender Quotas: Implementing gender quotas or temporary special measures can accelerate women’s representation. These mechanisms ensure that a certain percentage of seats are reserved for women, promoting equal participation. It is true that various legal instruments are in place to ensure gender parity (and there is also a special interest to advance SOGIE), but actual practice is wanting. We are interested in the recently pronounced DRIVE program of the DILG under the PH-OGP 6th NAP to score the functionality and quality of participation in LDCs. On the other hand, the demand (public participation) and supply (bureaucratic space) curve is yet to meet in perfect harmony. We also recognize that it is essential for women to continue scaling up their capacity to break free from (real or imagined) restrictions in political participation. This is what we at STANCe do in natural resource governance and we hope CHR can provide more community-based discussions on women participation with bias to ESCR and BHR.
2. Legal Reforms: Enact legislation that protects women’s political rights and prohibits discrimination. Legal safeguards against reprisals and harassment are essential. There are also good legal protections for women. But as a lawyer, I can point to a few instances where perception on women especially when moral and ethical standards are concerned defines women according to narrow and pedantic standards that are limiting and restrictive to growth and self-determination. You’d have to wonder how a president who enacted the Anti-bastos law in 2019 is the same person who humiliated a Senator and used anti-women language to legitimize her political detention in 2017. Going after paternal child support is also challenging.
3. Inclusive Dialogue: Create multi-stakeholder platforms where women’s voices are heard. Consultations during policy formulation should include diverse perspectives. STANCe continues to engage multilateral government spaces particularly PH-OGP where I was the outgoing Steercomm Nongov Representative for Visayas, and the PH-EITI whose policy direction has geared towards gender inclusion. Let us support these endeavors. I am also a member of the Development Administration Sector of RDC 7. And while within the RDC there are very engaged women leaders there, the impact of our representation of women within regional development planning is yet to examined. That should be a good policy research for students.
4. Awareness Campaigns and Capdev: Raising awareness about the importance of women’s participation as well as voters’ education on the value of diverse perspectives in decision-making is strategic. Investing in training programs for women leaders to enhance their skills in negotiation, policy formulation, and governance is also a reform-oriented intervention. Participation comes with a cost. On one hand, most of us who participates in multilateral platforms as mandated by law finds ourselves spending our own resources just so we can represent. On the other hand, not participating because of fiscal reasons may mean surrendering the space we can rightfully participate in as legitimate representative of our sector to someone else who might be less credible than us.
Let us bear in mind though that there is still a long way to go, a wide chasm we need to bridge, to affirm our place at the table of good governance. One thing also, women’s participation in political decision-making is not just a matter of numbers; it is about ensuring that policies reflect the needs and aspirations of all citizens especially women. As the Philippines continues its journey toward gender equality, empowering women in politics remains a collective responsibility. By breaking down barriers, challenging stereotypes, and promoting inclusive governance, we pave the way for a more equitable and just society.
I count myself fortunate to have found a mix of opportunities where my participation as a woman and mother is made possible. I know this may not be the same opportunity afforded to all women. I make it my own commitment to try and use my voice and agency alongside other advocates to take me to places, sometimes opposite to power, to highlight methods of exclusion and their effects on women everywhere. And please remember, we should not feel alone, in moments when we do, let us seek out other women and welcome them to our table. Let us provide each other with a warm blanket, a steaming cup of coffee, or an honest laughter. These are things we need, to continue the work at social transformation that comes from the power of remembering. Remembering who we are. Remembering what others did before us to pave the way. Remembering to leave a lighted lamp for the next generation to continue the journey.
Amy Faith Suson-SItoy
[1] https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf
[2] https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1217082; https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/news/in-the-news/philippines-improves-in-2023-world-gender-equality-ranking
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE NEW NONGOV STEERCOMM OF THE PH-OGP!!!
STANCe congratulates the new set of Non-government Members to the PH-OGP Steering Committee. May you find good fortune in this endeavor for an open government.
We also thank PH-OGP of the years of learning and opportunity as we say goodbye to the Steering Committee that embraced us to its membership during the previous term.
Mabuhi ug Padayon!
Archives
Welcome to our related resources.
UN SDGs here: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
PH-EITI here: https://pheiti.dof.gov.ph/
PH-OGP here: https://ogp.dbm.gov.ph/
On the withdrawal of the Duterte administration from the EITI [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WdScakkNZKSnXH9U9kIWlh1pR7Vg43xB/view?usp=share_link]
On vaccine equity [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VWoXEbyoCv8gfibQdFr8gXyjv_ga5Mvm/view?usp=share_link]
On the Carmen Copper landslide in Dec 2020 [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KU-JnIJyNz0ZMMvxMNhukCvkOrNmDIih/view?usp=share_link]
On tree cutting in Sibonga Cebu [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fbOl8brIURS7dl-I36ZEbWERySH--D6q/view?usp=share_link]
CSO Statement USA KA KALIBOTAN NGA MALAHUTAYON: PAMAHAYAG SA MGA SEKTOR ALANG SA USA KA SIHAG UG MAPANGAKOHON NGA PANGAGAMHANAN SA KINAIYAHAANONG BAHANDI [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNbN8RVifL5mgW2OUo-8hZifjqmDiG7-/view?usp=share_link]